The trial between Energy Transfer and Greenpeace commenced in a North Dakota courtroom regarding Greenpeace's alleged role in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. Energy Transfer seeks $300 million in damages, claiming Greenpeace incited unrest that led to significant financial losses and project delays. The lead attorney for Energy Transfer argues that the organization planned and funded illegal protests. In contrast, Greenpeace's lawyer contends they played a minor role in the demonstrations, which attracted around 100,000 participants, and presents a timeline to counter the claims.
Trey Cox, the lead lawyer for Energy Transfer, asserted the claim that Greenpeace is responsible for the protests, stating they will prove Greenpeace planned and funded illegal demonstrations.
Everett Jack Jr., lead lawyer for Greenpeace, countered by laying out a detailed timeline, insisting that Greenpeace played only a minor role in the large protests.
Collection
[
|
...
]