The article discusses the distinction between sovereign cloud and data sovereignty, emphasizing its relevance for governments rather than private enterprises. Sovereign clouds allow nations to keep data within borders and comply with local regulations, while also minimizing exposure to foreign access. Countries like Egypt, Singapore, and Germany are investing heavily in sovereign cloud initiatives. According to experts, businesses typically rely on established cloud provider controls, whereas governments seek a higher level of control and governance. Hyper-scalers need to adapt to the emerging demands for sovereign cloud solutions, which may differ significantly in functionality.
Sovereign cloud emphasizes national control over cloud environments, differentiating from data sovereignty by ensuring data is less susceptible to foreign access.
Governments across the globe, from Egypt to Ireland, are increasingly investing in sovereign clouds to maintain regulatory compliance and security.
While enterprises find value in existing public cloud frameworks, the uniqueness of sovereign clouds is compelling enough for national interests.
The concept of sovereign cloud calls for a nuanced understanding that goes beyond data residency, aiming instead for comprehensive national cloud governance.
Collection
[
|
...
]