
The argument centers on affordability, housing, the tax code, and government efficiency. High rent is attributed to government intervention that subsidizes demand while constraining supply through zoning and permitting. Evidence is offered that limiting short-term rentals does not reduce rents. The tax system is described as overly shaped by corporate welfare, subsidies, and business influence in politics. The claim is that increasing taxes on very high earners would not solve the problems affecting working people, including specific references to a teacher facing high costs. Government performance is framed as a key factor in whether policy changes improve outcomes.
"“If people want me to pay more billions, then let's have that debate. But don't pretend you know that this is going to solve the problem. You could double the taxes I pay and it's not going to help that teacher in queens, I promise you,” he said."
"“What's really causing high rent is government intervention. We subsidize demand with things like tax policy, which is fine, but at the same time, we constrain supply. We constrain supply with things like zoning and permitting,” he said. He pointed to New York City, where Airbnb has been largely outlawed yet rents have not come down, as evidence that restricting supply does not fix affordability."
"“We have way too much corporate welfare, way too much corporate subsidies. We have there's way too much influence in politics from business. The tax code is 1010,"
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]