Mayor Eric Adams’ situation escalated following the Justice Department’s move to dismiss his criminal indictment. Critics argue this dismissal came with implicit pressure for cooperation with President Trump’s immigration policies. A controversial letter from former U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon raised concerns about a quid pro quo arrangement suggested by Adams’ legal team. Despite the dismissal, which can be reinstated, significant doubts remain about Adams’ ability to govern without influence from the Trump administration. Adams strongly denied any expectations of impropriety, expressing his dedication to the people of New York.
Mayor Adams insists that there is no quid pro quo and that he is not beholden to anyone but the city's people. I want to be crystal clear with New Yorkers: I never offered nor did anyone offer on my behalf any trade of my authority as your mayor for an end to my case. Never, Adams said in a Feb. 14 statement released from City Hall. I am solely beholden to the 8.3 million New Yorkers that I represent, and I will always put this city first.
Critics have suggested that Mayor Adams' insistence on moving forward may be impossible due to revelations from former U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon.
Even after the dismissal motion, critics fear that this will effectively force Mayor Adams to comply with Trump's immigration crackdown or risk having the indictment against him revived.
Sassoon indicated that Adams’ attorneys had repeatedly urged what amounted to a quid pro quo, suggesting assistance with immigration enforcement priorities in exchange for the dismissal of the indictment.
Collection
[
|
...
]