Dr. Marie Russell's credibility as a dog bite expert is under scrutiny, as prosecutors claim her qualifications are outdated and not applicable to the case at hand.
The defense argues that John O'Keefe may have been attacked by a dog before being left outside, claiming the injuries were consistent with an animal bite rather than the alleged vehicle incident.
Prosecutors pointed out that Dr. Russell’s experience primarily involves law enforcement-related canine injuries and is irrelevant to assessing bites from pet dogs.
A key issue in the retrial is the admissibility of expert testimony regarding the victim's injuries, which may significantly influence the outcome of the case.
Collection
[
|
...
]