I was really taken with Jarman's work, and was especially happy to get to rave about a relatively unknown (in America) author and a book on an independent press.
All of this leads to book reviews feeling, for me, like a weird Frankenstein monster. A little bit of summary for the potential reader, a bit of critical analysis for those who've already read, some quotes to faithfully represent the author, etc. Somehow that has to be all stitched together in a coherent form.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]