Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's lawsuit contends that the Travis County Commissioners Court breached the Texas Open Meetings Act by not adequately informing the public about the purpose of a $115,000 expenditure for security expenses related to District Attorney José Garza. It was decided in a closed session and lacks transparency, which Paxton argues undermines public trust and accountability as the agenda item merely mentioned "Travis County security" without disclosing the specific nature involving personal safety for an elected official.
In a revealing move, Paxton states, "No member of the public could possibly infer from the posted agenda items that the Travis County Commissioners Court would be discussing the incredibly uncommon action of spending county funds on an elected official's private residence." This emphasizes the core issue regarding the lack of transparency around how public funds are discussed and allocated, especially when it concerns the personal security of officials and whether such actions align with public interest.
Collection
[
|
...
]