"Once upon a time, gallery exhibitions had much shorter runs than they do now. Jasper Johns's pivotal debut with Leo Castelli on Manhattan's Upper East Side in 1958 ran from just January 20 to February 8. In 1981, Robert Longo's "Men in the Cities" drawings had only a three-week run at Metro Pictures in SoHo. These days, a standard run is perhaps five or six weeks, or longer."
"There's a lot more competition for people's attention now, given the proliferation of galleries (never mind streaming services) in recent decades, so a longer run makes sense. Also, mounting shows is expensive, and they are not necessarily how art gets sold. A successful dealer told me recently that, while he loves staging exhibitions, works tend to sell only when he carts them to a far-flung fair, where collectors actually buy."
"A modest countermovement is afoot, though: Intriguing exhibitions have been appearing with startlingly short runs. Here one minute and gone the next, these short-run affairs will not wait around for you, and they proffer potential thrills, as well as bragging rights. Like a limited-time retail sale, they reward those who act."
Gallery exhibition durations have significantly expanded over decades. Historically, major debuts like Jasper Johns's 1958 show ran only three weeks, while Robert Longo's 1981 exhibition lasted similarly brief periods. Contemporary galleries typically maintain five to six-week runs or longer. This shift reflects increased competition from proliferating galleries and streaming services, requiring extended visibility to attract audiences. Additionally, mounting exhibitions proves expensive, and dealers report that actual sales often occur at art fairs rather than gallery shows. Counterintuitively, a modest trend of extremely short-run exhibitions has emerged, creating urgency and exclusivity that rewards attentive collectors and generates social prestige.
Read at Artnet News
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]