The National Gallery's acquisition of Peter Paul Rubens' 'Samson and Delilah' in 1980 has been challenged over its authenticity, prompting renewed debate after 45 years. A petition has been launched for the gallery to honor its 1997 commitment to a public discussion. Critics, including scholars and experts, question the painting's brushwork and style, suggesting it manifests characteristics of a 20th-century forgery rather than a genuine 17th-century piece. Ongoing scrutiny includes accusations of a cover-up regarding the painting's provenance, as well as comparisons to a museum scandal by ArtWatch UK's director.
The debate over Samson and Delilah's authenticity, acquired by the National Gallery in 1980, has reignited after a petition was launched for a public discussion.
Katarzyna Krzyzagorska-Pisarek described the painting as highly problematic and oddly modern, further fueling skepticism about its attribution to Rubens.
Michael Daley of ArtWatch UK claims to have uncovered substantial evidence questioning the painting's attribution, calling it the biggest museum scandal.
Christopher Wright criticized the painting’s lack of Rubens's subtlety, suggesting it exhibits more of a 20th-century style than that of the 17th-century master.
Collection
[
|
...
]