"As explained by X: When [a user] requests a note, AI drafts one, then the community refines it together through ratings and suggestions. You can watch it get better in real time. So rather than just relying on the AI response, and having a potentially flawed and/or misinterpreted AI answer as a fact-check, now, Community Notes contributors will be able to easily rate and respond to these AI notes, which could ensure that they're updated with more relevant, accurate information."
"That could help to address some key flaws with the notes system. A major problem with notes is the time that it takes for one to be displayed, because X is focused on real-time, in-the-moment discussion. That means that if it takes even 15 minutes for a note to be shown on a post, then at least some of its damage will be done, and it's impossible to get notes up on these posts in real-time."
X is testing Collaborative Notes that let human Community Notes contributors guide and improve AI-generated notes. When a user requests a note, AI drafts one and the community refines it through ratings and suggestions, with improvements visible in real time. AI-generated notes can appear faster than manually created notes, addressing delays that allow misinformation to circulate. Human ratings and suggestions can update AI drafts with more relevant and accurate information and reduce contributor research by quickly referencing source material. A caveat exists due to the system using Grok as the AI component.
Read at www.socialmediatoday.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]