Schmidt first made his case for an 'International Panel on AI Safety' - an 'IPCC for AI,' if you will - in an October 2023 op-ed in the Financial Times. He writes of the AI panel's potential to be an, 'an independent, expert-led body empowered to objectively inform governments about the current state of AI capabilities and make evidence-based predictions.'
'Increased understanding of the industry would doubtlessly help lawmakers to navigate whatever challenges AI will bring, but Schmidt's template of the IPCC to achieve that is flawed. One need only to look at the structure and record of the actual IPCC to see its failings.'
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]