Video: Opinion | China Doesn't Worry About A.I. Like We Do

"So at the moment, there are really only two countries that matter for the A.I. future, the United States and China. Their leaders are meeting in Beijing, and the atmosphere is similar to a kind of Cold War atmosphere where people think and argue and talk about them being in a kind of arms race. We're leading China. We're leading China by a lot. China knows that. I think at the moment, China is winning. There's no second place. It's either going to be the United States or China."

"How is China's current approach to A.I. different from the American approach? It's quite different, actually. So in the US, there's a particular focus on AGI, artificial general intelligence. And to create something approaching an artificial superintelligence, some kind of almost machine God that can do virtually everything that any human can do, at least on a computer, and more and more. That's right. You want to get more. That's the super part."

"Absolutely and you can see that the amount of spending, the amount of investment, the amount of effort that the American big tech companies and their quote unquote, startups like OpenAI and Anthropic, which are now close to $2 trillion each, are pouring into this is an indication that they're making a big bet that they can get there at some point, maybe in the near future."

"Yeah I don't think that Beijing is AGI pilled. Kyle Chan, welcome to Interesting Times. Great to be here. So at the moment, there are really only two countries that matter for the A.I. future, the United States and China. Their leaders are meeting in Beijing, and the atmosphere is similar to a kind of Cold War atmosphere where people think and argue and talk about them being in a kind of arms race."

The United States and China are treated as the two central powers shaping AI futures. The U.S. approach focuses on artificial general intelligence and building systems that can perform broadly like humans and beyond, with major spending by large tech firms and AI startups. China’s approach is described as different, with less emphasis on being “AGI pilled” and more emphasis on winning through current capabilities and deployment. Winning is framed as uncertain and potentially not meaningful as a simple race, since outcomes depend on what counts as success. The overall atmosphere is compared to a Cold War dynamic, with competition and strategic positioning driving efforts.

Read at www.nytimes.com