USPTO AI Guidance Reiterates DABUS Decision
Briefly

"while AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable, the inventorship analysis should focus on human contributions, as patents function to incentivize and reward human ingenuity."
"It follows that a single person who uses an AI system to create an invention is also required to make a significant contribution to the invention, according to the Pannu factors, to be considered a proper inventor."
Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
[
|
]