Thousands of CEOs admit AI had no impact on employment or productivity-and it has economists resurrecting a paradox from 40 years ago | Fortune
Briefly

Thousands of CEOs admit AI had no impact on employment or productivity-and it has economists resurrecting a paradox from 40 years ago | Fortune
"You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics. Despite the initial promise of technology to enhance productivity, the actual outcomes have often been disappointing."
"A study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that among 6,000 executives, the majority reported minimal impact from AI on their operations, with many using it for only 1.5 hours per week."
Robert Solow's observation in 1987 highlighted a paradox where technological advancements did not lead to expected productivity increases. Following the introduction of computers, productivity growth declined significantly. Recent data shows a similar trend with AI, where despite its adoption by many executives, productivity gains remain elusive. A study revealed that most executives see little impact from AI, with many using it for only a small fraction of their workweek. This suggests that the anticipated benefits of AI may not materialize as expected.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]