AI operates by predicting likely next words, producing fluent continuations that mimic conversation without true understanding. Training uses loss functions that optimize pattern matching to human language rather than correspondence to reality. Reinforcement learning from human feedback steers outputs toward what sounds pleasing or natural, not toward objective truth. Polished fluency and convincing phrasing create an appearance of intelligence that can seduce users and shape behavior despite lacking cognition. The system therefore often prioritizes rhetorical performance over factual grounding, making probability and polish masquerade as genuine thought while remaining fundamentally statistical.
At its core (dare I say heart), AI is a machine of probability. Word by word, it predicts what is most likely to come next. This continuation is dressed up as conversation, but it isn't cognition. It is a statistical trick that feels more and more like thought. Training reinforces the trick through what's called a loss function. But this isn't a pursuit of truth. It measures how well a sequence of words matches the patterns of human language.
And then we add another layer called reinforcement learning from human feedback. Here, people rank and reward the outputs that sound better, that feel more natural. The machine adjusts, not toward truth, but toward what pleases trainers. It's like coaching an actor to deliver lines with more conviction and not to understand the play, but to sell the performance. And as the trick grows sharper, the illusion harder to resist.
Collection
[
|
...
]