AI is sometimes used as a scapegoat for layoffs, with some companies blaming AI for job cuts that would have occurred anyway. Some displacement of certain job types by AI is real, but evidence for extensive damage to white-collar work is limited. The expectation of rapid elimination of entry-level white-collar roles has not matched observed outcomes. The shift in outlook is linked to underestimating the human component required in many jobs. Attempts to automate tasks like email and Slack responses led to continued personal replies, suggesting job impact may be different than initially predicted. Overall, there is no clear “jobs apocalypse” driven by AI so far.
"“I don't know what the exact percentage is, but there's some AI washing where people are blaming AI for layoffs that they would otherwise do. And then there's some real displacement by AI of different kinds of jobs,” Altman said at the time."
"“I'm delighted to be wrong about this,” he said on Tuesday during a virtual appearance at the Commonwealth Bank of Australia conference, according to a Reuters report. “I thought there would have been more impact on entry-level white-collar jobs being eliminated by now than has actually happened.”"
"“My intuitions were just off,” he added. “People are like, 'oh, you could have saved the world a lot of fear mongering and a lot of doom and gloom.' But at the time I was like, 'I see this is a real risk. We should probably talk about it.'”"
"“I don't think we're going to have the kind of jobs apocalypse that some of the companies in our space advocate or talk about,” he said. While companies have repeatedly cited AI and automation when conducting layoffs, the labor marke"
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]