In early 1975, the Asilomar conference brought together biologists to weigh the risks and benefits of genetic engineering techniques, notably recombinant DNA. Eva Amsen reflects on the event's legacy, highlighting its cautious approach and successful methodology in establishing guidelines for scientific debate, even though public interest groups were absent. Participant Paul Berg later expressed doubt about replicating such a consensus-driven conference today, foreseeing potential conflict and policy inertia. Asilomar's impact continues to influence scientific discussions, including newer fields such as AI, emphasizing the need for structured dialogue on emergent technologies.
"The conference was, as Amsen pointed out, a different time - one where a general sense of caution prevailed, and some scientists sought to get their colleagues to curb research on subjects they considered too risky."
"Observers consider Asilomar an exemplar of how scientists might debate risk and devise sensible guidelines; indeed, it set a standard for such conversations."
Paul Berg noted that although the Asilomar conference was groundbreaking, he is skeptical whether a similar consensus-driven conference could happen today, predicting it would be marked by acrimony and stagnation."
The Asilomar legacy remains pivotal in discussions across various scientific fields, reflecting the ongoing importance of deliberating risk and public engagement.
Collection
[
|
...
]