The article discusses the tensions between decentralized AI and centralization risks inherent in various altcoins and DePINs. It critiques how many cryptocurrencies still retain control points that can undermine their decentralized finance (DeFi) narratives. The author debates the implications of powerful AI monopolies, likening them to historic gods that must navigate both accolades and criticisms. He suggests that decentralization might lead to conflicts, legal challenges, and cultural battles as more creators contest AI's appropriation of their styles. The central question revolves around who controls the systems powering these intelligences.
In principle, a large DePIN could be cobbled together and trained to create a massive AI, but centralization points pose risks to its decentralization claims.
Altcoins face centralization problems undermining their DeFi narratives, as many have backdoors and operate on PoS protocols that empower original teams excessively.
A Eurasia-AI / Americas-AI Master Copy would likely be more powerful, demonstrating that larger AIs possess an inherent advantage.
Decentralizing AI might involve drastic measures like lawsuits or conflicts, especially as concerns grow over AI's impact on cultural assets and creator competition.
Collection
[
|
...
]