Larry Magid: Budget bill clause could ban state AI regulations
Briefly

A budget bill recently passed in the House includes a clause that prohibits states from regulating AI for the next decade. This clause is designed to prevent a patchwork of state laws but raises concerns about the lack of oversight for AI technologies. The writer acknowledges the risks associated with generative AI and advocates for thoughtful regulation. While they support the need for federal oversight, they also express skepticism about Congress's ability to implement effective consumer protection laws promptly, especially given the current polarized political landscape.
The bill's clause prohibits any state from imposing regulations on AI for a decade, raising concerns about the need for proper oversight in a rapidly evolving field.
While I'm a fan of AI innovations, I also understand that with great power comes great responsibility—thoughtful regulation is essential to prevent risks and harms.
State-level legislation has historically created a confusing patchwork of laws, making it difficult for companies to comply, particularly for technologies that span jurisdictions.
Although I advocate for more stringent federal regulations on AI, the sluggish pace of Congress makes immediate effective oversight seem unlikely.
Read at The Mercury News
[
|
]