"Accessible design, inclusive design, adaptive learning, accessibility, and AI are often discussed together, even if the connections between them are still evolving. However, most of these conversations assume a certain context: mature Learning and Development (L&D) teams, enterprise platforms, dedicated accessibility expertise, and the time and budget to implement complex systems, which makes sense as many of these ideas were developed for large organizations."
"Many learning products don't live in that world. I've worked on eLearning products and the realities of small teams are different: limited resources, competing priorities, and the constant pressure to ship and iterate. From that perspective, what do AI-driven accessibility and adaptive learning actually look like for learning products designed by small teams? And can they realistically help without becoming another layer of complexity?"
Small eLearning teams face constrained resources, competing priorities, and pressure to ship and iterate quickly. Accessibility often competes with bug fixes, new features, content updates, and customer requests. Adaptive learning is attractive but commonly linked to complex systems, large datasets, and long implementations beyond small-team capacity. AI can offer practical, lightweight tools to automate accessibility checks, generate alternative content formats, and personalize simple adaptive paths without enterprise infrastructure. Realistic adoption requires choosing high-impact automations, integrating off-the-shelf AI services, and iterating incrementally to avoid added complexity. Prioritizing core accessibility wins and pragmatic AI use can improve inclusion within tight budgets.
Read at eLearning Industry
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]