Google Stax Aims to Make AI Model Evaluation Accessible for Developers

"Google Stax is a framework designed to replace subjective evaluations of AI models with an objective, data-driven, and repeatable process for measuring model output quality. Google says this will allow AI developers to tailor the evaluation process to their specific use cases rather than relying on generic benchmarks. According to Google, evaluation is key to selecting the right model for a given solution by comparing quality, latency, and cost."

"It is also essential for assessing how effective prompt engineering and fine-tuning efforts actually are in improving results. Another area where repeatable benchmarks are valuable is agent orchestration, where they help ensure that agents and other components work reliably together. Stax provides data and tools to build benchmarks that combine human judgement and automated evaluators. Developers can import production-ready datasets or create their own, either by uploading existing data or by using LLMs to generate synthetic datasets."

"Likewise, Stax includes a suite of default evaluators for common metrics such as verbosity and summarization, while allowing the creation of custom evaluators for more specific or fine-grained criteria. A custom evaluator can be created in a few steps, beginning with selecting the base LLM that will act as a judge. The judge is provided with a prompt instructing how to evaluate the tested model's output."

Google Stax replaces subjective AI model evaluations with an objective, data-driven, repeatable process for measuring model output quality, enabling tailored evaluations for specific use cases rather than generic benchmarks. Evaluation compares quality, latency, and cost to select appropriate models and to assess prompt engineering, fine-tuning, and agent orchestration reliability. Stax supplies data and tools to build benchmarks combining human judgment and automated evaluators, with options to import production datasets, upload custom data, or generate synthetic datasets via LLMs. It includes default evaluators for common metrics (verbosity, summarization) and supports custom evaluator creation using a base LLM judge, prompts defining graded categories, and calibration against human ratings.

Read at InfoQ