The Make America Healthy Again Report, recently released by the White House, has come under scrutiny as AI specialists identified embedded oaicite markers suggesting AI involvement in sourcing. Critics argue that the report cites numerous fictional studies and authors, thereby fundamentally undermining its validity. Notably, experts indicated that the issues stem from common AI errors known as hallucinations, further exacerbating concerns regarding truthfulness. Prominent voices in public health and AI ethics have condemned the report's integrity, emphasizing that its findings cannot support informed policy discussions.
Experts claim that the Make America Healthy Again Report may have been improperly crafted using artificial intelligence, raising concerns about its validity and reliability.
Researchers noted that the report's citations contain oaicite markers, indicative of AI-generated content, suggesting significant reliance on erroneous AI tools for sourcing.
Georges C. Benjamin stated, 'This is not an evidence-based report ... it cannot even be used for any serious discussion, because you can't believe what's in it.'
Oren Etzioni criticized the overall quality of the report's research process, saying, 'Frankly, that's shoddy work, he said. We deserve better.'
Collection
[
|
...
]