It's possible that this practice is already disturbingly widespread.
If the only things that 'count' are things we can easily count (like number of publications), you incentivize the thoughtless production of things that count.
Using ChatGPT in this way should be self-evidently absurd.
#generative-ai-content #peer-reviewed-publications #academic-productivity #academic-integrity #chatgpt
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]