Recent studies from Stanford University reveal that AI, particularly ChatGPT, outperformed doctors in diagnosing ailments and making complex clinical decisions. With AI scoring 90% in diagnosis compared to human doctors' 74-76%, it demonstrates significant potential in medical settings. However, Dr. Jonathan H. Chen cautions that while AI can enhance medical expertise, it should not replace human judgment. Instead, it should serve as a complementary tool in healthcare, ensuring that patients still receive comprehensive care.
In the first experiment testing diagnosis powers, doctors who did not have access to ChatGPT received a score of 74%. Doctors who had access to ChatGPT scored slightly better at 76%. But the AI alone scored 90%.
So, what's the upshot? If the AI is so good, should human doctors get out of its way? Dr. Chen says chatbots may be a valuable complement to human expertise, but warns it's not a replacement.
Collection
[
|
...
]