University students are increasingly relying on AI to perform high-level cognitive tasks, a trend described as inverted learning. This phenomenon is leading to a detachment from fundamental learning processes, with students engaging less in analysis and creation. A 2025 report highlights that a majority of students turn to AI for complex tasks, risking the deterioration of their critical thinking capabilities. Addressing this issue may require a return to Socratic methods, emphasizing dialogue and critical engagement rather than outsourcing cognitive responsibilities to AI.
University students engage in fierce intellectual combat, not with each other but with their laptops, crafting the perfect prompt to make AI write their essays.
When students delegate analysis, evaluation, and creation, the highest-order thinking skills to AI systems, they risk atrophying the cognitive muscles needed for critical thinking.
The Socratic method was more than a teaching technique. It was a psychological framework for developing critical thinking through the structured practice of dialogue.
Nearly 40 percent of students use AI for creation and 30 percent for analysis, while barely 2 percent use it for remembering facts.
Collection
[
|
...
]