The iPhone 17E is good, but you probably shouldn't buy it
Briefly

The iPhone 17E is good, but you probably shouldn't buy it
"The 17E replaces the 16E in Apple's lineup. The 16E was the first in a new series: not an older chassis with some refreshed internals for a steep discount, like the iPhone SE was. Instead, the 16E was a full member of its iPhone generation, just a bit worse and ultimately slightly too expensive. Its $600 price tag felt too high for a phone missing one of Apple's core iPhone features: MagSafe."
"After years of 'Eh, the regular iPhone is okay,' the iPhone 17 finally brought the basic iPhone up to a new level of 'Yeah, this is the one most people should get.' Mainly, it got a ProMotion display - until last fall, Apple had reserved the 120Hz screen for the Pro models. With that feature, it also got an always-on display, or AOD, which is useful for checking notifications, widgets, and even just the time at a glance."
"a $600 iPhone makes less sense than ever when the $800 one is fully up to speed."
The iPhone 17E improves upon the 16E by adding MagSafe support, increasing base storage to 256GB, and maintaining the $600 price point. However, the iPhone 17's introduction at $800 with ProMotion display and always-on display functionality makes the 17E a less attractive option. While the 17E represents genuine improvements over its predecessor, the regular iPhone 17 now offers significantly better features at only $200 more, making it the more compelling choice for most consumers. The 16E's original $600 price felt unjustified due to missing MagSafe, a core iPhone feature, but this gap has been addressed in the newer model.
Read at The Verge
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]