Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a stern 80-page ruling against Apple, emphasizing their anticompetitive behavior by not allowing app developers to link to other payment methods. Although Apple ultimately won the original case, Rogers pointed out how they undermined developers’ ability to secure lower fees. She condemned Apple's decision to only lower its commission to 27%, as well as the use of 'scare screens' intended to intimidate developers. This ruling has significant implications for Apple's business model and its standing among iOS developers as they face mounting scrutiny legally and reputationally.
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers was adamant that Apple must allow app developers to offer alternative payment methods, highlighting anticompetitive practices in their existing system.
Apple's decision to only reduce its commission to 27%, coupled with intimidating 'scare screens,' demonstrates its intent to dissuade developers from exploring alternatives to their payment system.
Collection
[
|
...
]