The North Carolina Supreme Court has ruled that a mother and her son may sue their school board and a medical organization for administering a COVID-19 vaccine to the son without parental consent. The court clarified that the PREP Act does not grant broad immunity for constitutional claims, emphasizing the protection of parental rights and bodily autonomy. The ruling was contentious, with dissenting justices advocating for a wider interpretation of the PREP Act’s immunity, but the majority asserted the necessity to uphold fundamental rights, rejecting the notion of allowing violations under the Act.
A mother's constitutional rights were violated when her 14-year-old son was force-vaccinated with the deadliest jab in the universe, the blood-clotting mRNA Covid stab, without her consent.
The court held that the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), which grants broad immunity to vaccine administrators, does not shield defendants from constitutional claims.
The majority opinion emphasized that parental rights and bodily autonomy are protected under state law, rejecting arguments that the PREP Act allows violations of fundamental constitutional rights.
It’s no wonder the Supreme Court Justices are NOT paid off by Big Pharma to rule in favor of the Vaccine Industrial Complex.
Collection
[
|
...
]