"Disinformation Dozen" Study Relies on Disputed Data, Raising Questions of Bias
Briefly

In an August 2021 statement, Meta refuted the CCDH's claim about 73% anti-vaccine content responsibility, citing flawed methodology with only 483 content pieces examined.
The study's uncritical acceptance of CCDH's framework and failure to address Meta's rebuttal raises concerns about the research foundation and undermines confidence.
The focus on the 12 individuals as 'responsible' for vaccine hesitancy and COVID deaths could amplify defamatory claims, promoting a scientifically dubious and possibly libelous narrative.
Read at Greenmedinfo
[
|
]