Debunking McGill's "Dirty Dozen" Hit Piece: Flawed Sources, Pharma Ties, and Biased Reporting
Briefly

A McGill University study accusing 12 individuals of driving the majority of online anti-vaccine misinformation, relying on a refuted report by CCDH, is criticized for lacking academic integrity.
Meta's VP of Content Policy refuted CCDH's claim, stating the report analyzed a narrow set of 483 pieces of content, not representative of the actual scale of vaccine-related posts on Facebook.
Read at Greenmedinfo
[
|
]