The article discusses the challenges startups face with unrealistic product development timelines, largely driven by the pressures of agile methodologies. The author advocates for a six-week sprint model, emphasizing that this approach allows for more thorough development, testing, and feedback. Unlike traditional two-week cycles that can lead to superficial results, the six-week sprint focuses on delivering quality product iterations and learning from user feedback, encouraging a more adaptable and effective method for startups in a fast-paced environment.
"Building software isn't a commodity. You can't snap your fingers and call something 'done.' It's more of an art than science."
Collection
[
|
...
]