I hate to be the scowling lesbian at the feast but here's what worries me about the new Austen adaptations | Emma Brockes
Briefly

Jane Austen's works emphasize the significant notion that a woman's best story ends with marriage, presenting shrewd insights into being a woman of substance. Recent adaptations of her novels continue this tradition, reinforcing the idea that a woman's narrative must culminate in securing a man. New interpretations, such as Lena Dunham's Too Much, play with these themes, contrasting Austen's romantic ideals with contemporary relationships, showcasing the persistent relevance of Austen's observations even after two centuries. The ongoing fascination with her characters and stories reflects deep-seated cultural expectations regarding women's roles.
The novels of Jane Austen offer endless shrewd judgments about how to be a woman of substance, with the vital lesson that failing to secure a man is a woman's worst fate.
In recent adaptations, including a Netflix miniseries of Pride and Prejudice and a new version of Sense and Sensibility, the narrative remains: a woman's story is best concluded with marriage.
Jessica, in Lena Dunham's Too Much, contrasts Austen's ideal with her own experiences, embodying the tension between romantic expectations from Austen's works and modern relationships.
Despite the meta-treatment of romcoms in contemporary adaptations, the core assumption from Austen's time — that a woman's story culminates in marriage — persists even after two centuries.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]