"The CAFC said Philips forfeited its argument that the prior art combination would lead to the 'absurd result' of continually calculating the magnitude of the adjustment for every transmission."
"The Federal Circuit agreed with Philips that the PTAB erred in concluding that an asserted prior art reference taught the application of an offset to an 'initial transmission power,' remanding to the PTAB for a better evaluation."
"Claim 9 of the '216 patent claims a radio communication system regulating the power of communications between base stations and mobile stations in a way that addresses technological issues that can arise when data transmissions are interrupted."
"Quectel filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) to challenge the validity of claim 9 of Philips' U.S. Patent No. 8195216, focusing on its obviousness based on two prior art references."
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]