#obviousness

[ follow ]
#patent-law #federal-circuit #inter-partes-review #patent-eligibility #ptab #ridesharing #dose-range
frompatentlyo.com
3 days ago

Thanks for Your Input: Federal Circuit Ignores USPTO's 101 Framework (Again)

The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB determination that claims directed to vehicle identification systems for ridesharing services were unpatentable for obviousness, but reversed the Board's grant of Rideshare's motion to amend substitute claims. Judge Hughes, writing for the panel, held that the substitute claims were directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101 because they merely used technology as a tool to improve user experience rather than improving computer functionality itself.
#patent-law
more#patent-law
fromIPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
2 months ago

CAFC Upholds Win for Janssen on Patent for Antipsychotic Med Dosing Regimen

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed that Teva Pharmaceuticals did not prove the claims of Janssen Pharmaceuticals' patent for antipsychotic dosing regimens invalid for obviousness.
Law
Intellectual property law
fromPatently-O
4 months ago

Federal Circuit on Negative Limitations and Secondary Considerations

Federal Circuit maintains a strict approach to patent obviousness and secondary considerations.
Court underscores precise claim construction in patent cases.
[ Load more ]