"Directed to" vs. "Reciting" vs. "Involving" an Abstract Idea
Briefly

The Board clarified that while the claims in Ex parte Annakov were initially deemed ineligible under § 101, they ultimately met the eligibility criteria upon review.
Although the Board acknowledged the innovative aspects of the distributed service-and-transaction system for aircraft passengers, they upheld the examiner's decision on obviousness under § 103 for the majority of the claims.
Read at Patently-O
[
]
[
|
]