AI is Not Creative Per the USCO and the Courts - And That's a Good Thing
Briefly

Doctrinally, patents and copyrights speak different languages.... Thus, in principle, both the causal inquiry and the conclusions regarding protectability can differ.
AI-generated works are unprotectable not because it was AI and not the human who supplied originality - they are unprotectable because the purported human author did not make an original contribution to the work in question.
Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
[
add
]
[
|
|
]