#inventorship

[ follow ]
Global IP & Technology Law Blog
3 months ago
Artificial intelligence

Who Invented This? The Continuing Importance of Human Ingenuity in Patenting AI Related Inventions

AI systems are increasingly important in various industries.
USPTO issued Guidance on inventorship for AI-assisted inventions. [ more ]
#uspto
The IP Law Blog
4 months ago
Artificial intelligence

USPTO Issues Guidance on Patentability of Inventions Developed with the Assistance of Artificial Intelligence

The USPTO issued guidance stating that a human must have made a significant contribution to inventions developed with AI assistance.
The use of AI systems does not preclude a natural person from being named as the inventor if they significantly contributed to the invention. [ more ]
Intellectual Property Law Blog
4 months ago
Artificial intelligence

AI-Assisted Inventions: Are They Patentable? Who is the Inventor?

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued guidance on inventorship for AI-assisted inventions.
The USPTO requires that a natural person must have significantly contributed to each claim in a patent application or patent. [ more ]
Ars Technica
4 months ago
Artificial intelligence

US says AI models can't hold patents

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has clarified that only human beings can be named as inventors, even for AI-assisted inventions.
While AI systems can play a role in the creative process, significant human contributions to the conception of an invention are required to be considered an inventor.
Using AI assistance to create an invention does not disqualify a human from holding a patent, as long as the human made significant contributions to the invention. [ more ]
Patently-O
4 months ago
Artificial intelligence

Joint Inventorship: AI-Human Style

The USPTO believes AI-developed inventions are patentable as long as a human significantly contributes to the invention.
The USPTO's approach allows for both human and machine intelligence to intersect in the creative process. [ more ]
IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
2 weeks ago
Artificial intelligence

USPTO Extends Deadline for AI Inventorship Comments as Some Criticize Pannu Factors

Public comments urge broad patentability pathway for AI inventions. [ more ]
The IP Law Blog
4 months ago
Artificial intelligence

USPTO Issues Guidance on Patentability of Inventions Developed with the Assistance of Artificial Intelligence

The USPTO issued guidance stating that a human must have made a significant contribution to inventions developed with AI assistance.
The use of AI systems does not preclude a natural person from being named as the inventor if they significantly contributed to the invention. [ more ]
Intellectual Property Law Blog
4 months ago
Artificial intelligence

AI-Assisted Inventions: Are They Patentable? Who is the Inventor?

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued guidance on inventorship for AI-assisted inventions.
The USPTO requires that a natural person must have significantly contributed to each claim in a patent application or patent. [ more ]
Ars Technica
4 months ago
Artificial intelligence

US says AI models can't hold patents

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has clarified that only human beings can be named as inventors, even for AI-assisted inventions.
While AI systems can play a role in the creative process, significant human contributions to the conception of an invention are required to be considered an inventor.
Using AI assistance to create an invention does not disqualify a human from holding a patent, as long as the human made significant contributions to the invention. [ more ]
Patently-O
4 months ago
Artificial intelligence

Joint Inventorship: AI-Human Style

The USPTO believes AI-developed inventions are patentable as long as a human significantly contributes to the invention.
The USPTO's approach allows for both human and machine intelligence to intersect in the creative process. [ more ]
IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
2 weeks ago
Artificial intelligence

USPTO Extends Deadline for AI Inventorship Comments as Some Criticize Pannu Factors

Public comments urge broad patentability pathway for AI inventions. [ more ]
moreuspto
IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
6 months ago
Artificial intelligence

AI is Not Creative Per the USCO and the Courts - And That's a Good Thing

The U.S. Copyright Office and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office have different views on the capabilities of AI in relation to creativity and inventorship.
Patents and copyrights are doctrinally and conceptually different, so conclusions regarding protectability can differ.
The recent guidance from the USCO and court decisions have found that human creativity is essential for copyrightability, regardless of AI involvement. [ more ]
[ Load more ]