#supreme-court-tariff-ruling

[ follow ]
fromThe Atlantic
2 days ago
US Elections

Will Small Businesses Get Their Money Back?

The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump lacked constitutional authority to impose tariffs without congressional approval, invalidating trade policies that cost American households $1,800 and harmed small businesses.
US politics
fromIntelligencer
3 days ago

Trump Goes Ballistic on Supreme Court in Overnight Rant

Trump criticized the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision striking down his foreign tariffs, claiming he retains absolute tariff authority and praising the three conservative dissenters while attacking the liberal justices and Republican justices who joined them.
US Elections
fromFortune
1 week ago

CBO highlights the good news in Trump's lost tariff revenue hiking the deficit by $2 trillion: lower inflation and unemployment-and higher GDP | Fortune

Supreme Court struck down most Trump tariffs, eliminating $300 billion annual revenue but providing relief to U.S. consumers and businesses from pricing pressures.
US Elections
fromFortune
1 week ago

The Treasury may need to borrow extra $1.6 trillion to cover the hole left by tariff ruling, says CBO-adding $400 billion in debt interest by 2036 | Fortune

Supreme Court ruled most 2025 tariffs illegal, eliminating $300 billion in annual Treasury revenue and increasing projected deficits by $2 trillion over a decade.
fromFortune
2 weeks ago

Trump's loss of $1.7 trillion in tariff revenue will send the national debt to $58 trillion by 2036, think tank projects | Fortune

Without that revenue, CRFB projects the national debt will climb to 125% of GDP-or roughly $58 trillion-by fiscal year 2036, compared to a baseline projection of $56 trillion, or 120% of GDP, that assumed the IEEPA tariffs would remain in force. Deficits in that scenario will rise to 7.1% of GDP, or $3.3 trillion.
US politics
US politics
fromemptywheel
2 weeks ago

The Bullshit about John Roberts' Tolerance for Bullshit - emptywheel

The Supreme Court's tariff ruling prompted debate over judicial impartiality, with observers disagreeing on whether it demonstrates independence or reflects partisan patterns in decision-making.
[ Load more ]