#supreme-court-case

[ follow ]
#transgender-rights

In just a few years, half of all states passed bans on trans health care for kids

Transgender youth face increasing challenges accessing gender-affirming healthcare, leading to legal battles impacting their well-being.

What is U.S. v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court case that could change gender-affirming care forever?

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a significant case on gender-affirming care for trans minors, potentially impacting rights and care standards nationwide.

10/22

The Advocate's roundtable seeks to elevate trans youth voices amid legislative challenges.
Trump's statements on trans youth represent a troubling narrative ahead of the 2024 election.
Chase Strangio's Supreme Court case is pivotal for the future of gender-affirming healthcare.

In just a few years, half of all states passed bans on trans health care for kids

Transgender youth face increasing challenges accessing gender-affirming healthcare, leading to legal battles impacting their well-being.

What is U.S. v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court case that could change gender-affirming care forever?

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a significant case on gender-affirming care for trans minors, potentially impacting rights and care standards nationwide.

10/22

The Advocate's roundtable seeks to elevate trans youth voices amid legislative challenges.
Trump's statements on trans youth represent a troubling narrative ahead of the 2024 election.
Chase Strangio's Supreme Court case is pivotal for the future of gender-affirming healthcare.
moretransgender-rights
#medical-misinformation

Revealed: trans rights case at US supreme court features doctors previously discredited by judges

The US Supreme Court will rule on transgender youth's right to access gender-affirming healthcare, affecting future LGBTQ+ rights and healthcare autonomy.

Health Misinformation Is Evolving. Here's How to Spot It.

Misinformation on social media is advancing rapidly, undermining trust in vaccines and public health experts.
Experts advise validating health claims with trusted sources and being vigilant about emotional manipulation online.

Revealed: trans rights case at US supreme court features doctors previously discredited by judges

The US Supreme Court will rule on transgender youth's right to access gender-affirming healthcare, affecting future LGBTQ+ rights and healthcare autonomy.

Health Misinformation Is Evolving. Here's How to Spot It.

Misinformation on social media is advancing rapidly, undermining trust in vaccines and public health experts.
Experts advise validating health claims with trusted sources and being vigilant about emotional manipulation online.
moremedical-misinformation

Safe Harbor at a Crossroads: Examining Regulatory Development Shield of 271(e)(1) in Edwards v. Meril

The Supreme Court's review of Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. Meril Life Sciences could redefine the Hatch-Waxman Act's safe harbor provision regarding regulatory and commercial activity scope.

Trump case: Supreme Court reluctant to grant full immunity to former president

The Supreme Court justices are considering whether a former president can be tried for his role in trying to subvert the 2020 presidential elections.

5 Takeaways From the Supreme Court Arguments on Idaho's Abortion Ban

The case before the Supreme Court questions Idaho's near-total abortion ban violating federal law on emergency care, potentially affecting multiple states and raising broader legal implications.

US Supreme Court Considers Whether Hospitals Must Provide Emergency Abortions

Pro-abortion activists rally for reproductive rights and emergency abortion care outside the US Supreme Court during Moyle v. United States case.

The Supreme Court will decide the fate of emergency abortions. Here is what's at stake

Hospitals face legal conflicts in states with abortion restrictions, caught between federal and state laws during medical emergencies.
#legal-implications

Snyder V. United States Could Legalize Bribery for Public Officials

Supreme Court case on public corruption
Nuance in bribery statute

Why an Oregon Case Before the Supreme Court Matters So Much to California

The Supreme Court case City of Grants Pass v. Johnson is examining whether fining homeless individuals for sleeping outside when shelter is lacking is cruel and unusual punishment.

Snyder V. United States Could Legalize Bribery for Public Officials

Supreme Court case on public corruption
Nuance in bribery statute

Why an Oregon Case Before the Supreme Court Matters So Much to California

The Supreme Court case City of Grants Pass v. Johnson is examining whether fining homeless individuals for sleeping outside when shelter is lacking is cruel and unusual punishment.
morelegal-implications

Thursday Morning What's Up: Sting Operation Targets Drivers In West Portal

The 118th anniversary of the Great Earthquake and Fire of 1906 was commemorated, San Francisco police conducted sting operations to catch drivers not yielding to pedestrians, and significant legal, business, and safety updates were reported.

Mifepristone access is coming before the US Supreme Court. How safe is this abortion pill?

The U.S. Supreme Court hearing a case on access to mifepristone
FDA's evolving safety regulations on mifepristone

The Supreme Court's mifepristone decision could make abortions harder to access and challenge the FDA's authority to regulate all drugs and devices

Potential impact of Supreme Court case on abortion access and FDA authority
Implications of limiting FDA's regulatory authority on healthcare products
from www.nytimes.com
8 months ago

Court Overturns Sentencing Enhancement Used in Jan. 6 Rioter Cases

The federal appeals court ordered resentencing of a Jan. 6 rioter due to a longer sentence applied incorrectly.
The court upheld the rioter's felony conviction for obstructing Congress's certification of the electoral count.

Opinion | Texas Is Right. The Tech Giants Need to Be Regulated.

Social media platforms regulate speech through content rules
Supreme Court to decide on social media platforms vs. free speech debate

A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election

Seth Barrett Tillman's unusual interpretation of the U.S. Constitution is gaining attention in the Supreme Court case regarding Donald Trump's eligibility for Colorado's primary ballot.
Tillman argues that the phrase 'officer of the United States' in the Constitution refers only to appointed positions, not the presidency.

Anti-Abortion Activists Press Ahead After Supreme Court Ruling

Anti-abortion groups express disappointment over Supreme Court's abortion pill decision, but remain hopeful and determined to continue fighting.
[ Load more ]