#prosecution-disclaimer

[ follow ]
fromPatently-O
16 hours ago

Prosecution Disclaimer Across Time: Later Continuation Statements Limit Already-Issued Patents

In Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. v. Fortress Iron, LP, No. 2024-1231 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 17, 2025), the FedCir affirmed a non-infringement judgment based on prosecution disclaimer, holding that statements made during prosecution of a later-filed continuation application limited the scope of already-issued patents from the same family. This reinforces a similar holding in Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 789 F.3d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (statements in prosecution files of related patents are relevant to claim construction "regardless of whether the statement pre- or post-dates the issuance of the particular patent at issue.").
Intellectual property law
Intellectual property law
fromIPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
18 hours ago

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, October 17: CAFC Finds Prosecution Disclaimer in Examiner Acceptance of Patentee's Scope; Japan Urges Opt-In Copyright Model for Sora 2; and Seventh Circuit Clarifies Evidence Required for Sound Recording Copyright Claims

The Federal Circuit applied prosecution disclaimer based on patentee communications with the PTO, while multiple courts and agencies ruled on varied IP and safety matters.
[ Load more ]