#proposition-33

#proposition-33

California's voters rejected a proposal to overturn statewide rent control restrictions, indicating broad reluctance for such measures despite growing concerns over housing affordability.

Proposition 33 may restore local control over rent control in California, providing critical relief in the housing crisis.

California faces a severe housing crisis, impacting families who struggle financially due to rising rents.

Proposition 33 aims to repeal restrictive rent control laws, potentially stabilizing housing costs for families.

Stories like Simon-Weisberg's illustrate the personal toll of California's housing policies on families.

Proposition 33 aimed to allow stronger rent control laws in California but is unlikely to pass, following similar past failures.

California voters rejected Proposition 33, denying an expansion of rent control for the third time, reflecting ongoing housing struggles in the state.

California voters decide on Proposition 33 to give cities more power to control rents by repealing Costa-Hawkins.

Proposition 33 could establish rent increases caps for older rentals and newly rented units in Berkeley if passed.

Proposition 33 could significantly expand rent control in California, amidst rising housing costs and increased public debate.

Voters should reject Proposition 33 and Proposition 34 to encourage housing supply and prevent rent control from driving up costs.

San Francisco expands rent control efforts, pending voter approval to repeal the Costa-Hawkins Act, amid a housing affordability crisis.

Proposition 33 seeks to give local governments increased authority for rent control to address housing affordability issues in California.

Rent control is critical for tenant stability and affordability in San Francisco.

Support for Proposition 33 is crucial to expanding rent control protections.