The article discusses the complex relationship between artists and their rights over their work post-sale. It highlights various cases, such as David Phillips versus Fidelity, where artists have contested changes made to their work. Legal battles exemplified by Tal R and the Kanske watch brand shed light on philosophical concerns regarding artists' rights post-sale. The article underscores the struggle to balance artistic integrity with ownership rights, presenting scenarios that challenge conventional views on art as mere goods.
One approach is to consider selling a work of art like selling other goods. Suppose Sally hires Jane to paint the interior of her house. After the work is done, Sally decides she has changed her mind about one room and plans to have it repainted.
Tal R condemned the project and won an injunction in court. While the court battle sorted out the legal issue, the philosophical problem is determining what rights an artist retains over their work once they have sold it.
Collection
[
|
...
]