"What Ranalli calls 'epistemically insulating content' is any belief that comes prepackaged with the instruction that seriously questioning it is either irrational or immoral. It's a psychological cage - a cage where the door in and out stays barred."
"Ranalli points out that indoctrination is when someone preemptively dismisses any counterevidence that may come along. In an epistemically neutral situation, someone might look at the evidence that arrives, weigh it up, and accept or reject it before you can say 'Bayesian analysis.' But when you're indoctrinated, you've already decided, before the evidence shows up, that it cannot possibly be valid."
Nietzsche observed that philosophers obsess over truth as the ultimate good, yet most people prioritize being right over discovering truth. When presented with information contradicting their beliefs, people's minds lock down—a phenomenon philosopher Chris Ranalli calls indoctrination. Ranalli defines indoctrination through social epistemology as beliefs insulated from external scrutiny through instructions declaring questioning irrational or immoral. This creates a psychological cage where counterevidence is preemptively dismissed. Unlike epistemically neutral situations where evidence is weighed rationally, indoctrinated individuals reject contrary opinions without examination, having predetermined that opposing views cannot be valid.
Read at Big Think
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]