Nietzsche's Ethics: Master vs Slave Morality

Nietzsche links modern moral life to the triumph of slave morality over natural master morality. Slave morality treats meekness as a moral choice and turns weakness into an ideal, presenting impotence as virtue. The older master morality cannot be fully eliminated, so its influence persists and produces confusion about values. Nietzsche also viewed nationalism and democracy as successors to Christianity’s slave morality. He instead promoted the ideal of the “good European,” a cosmopolitan individual who transcends national and religious prejudices and seeks a higher cultural synthesis for Europe. In 1886, he published Beyond Good and Evil, framed as meta-ethics about what “good” and “evil” mean rather than prescribing norms.

"For Nietzsche, modern society represents the triumph of slave morality over the natural master morality. By pretending that meekness is a moral choice, slave morality manufactures an ideal out of impotence. But the old master morality cannot be completely vanquished, leaving us thoroughly confused."

"Nietzsche looked upon nationalism and democracy as the successors of the slave morality of Christianity. Instead, he championed the ideal of the "good European", a cosmopolitan, supra-national individual who transcends petty national and religious prejudices and strives to unite Europe through a new, higher cultural synthesis. In 1886, the year that Elisabeth left for Paraguay, he wrote to his mother from the Swiss Alps, "Even if I should be a bad German, I am at all events a very good European.""

"In 1886, Nietzsche broke with his publisher Ernst Schmeitzner, an antisemite who had been publishing antisemitic literature and propaganda while neglecting Nietzsche's work. In that year, Nietzsche also published a new book, Beyond Good and Evil (1886), which consists of 296 aphorisms organised into nine chapters. As the title suggests, this is not a work of normative ethics (what is good and evil) but of meta-ethics (what is meant by "good" and "evil")."

Read at Psychology Today