"Trump chronicler Michael Wolff shared his belief this week that "nothing" Trump says is ever "related to meaning" but it's "all related to what he is feeling" - which, he says, informs Trump's behaviour around the Iran war."
"Communications director Steven Cheung responded by calling Wolff "a lying sack of s-t" who has "been proven to be a fraud". This in itself is unusually emotional (and colloquial) language for an official White House communication, but is not surprising in the era of Trump 2.0."
"From "I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!" to the president's many legal suits against those who have wronged him and his apparent need for his name to be on buildings - including the former Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts - big feelings are on full display in the era of Donald Trump."
Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris, both highly qualified Democratic candidates with extensive government experience, lost presidential elections to Donald Trump in 2016 and 2024 respectively. Their defeats sparked widespread debate about whether the United States is ready to elect a female president, often referencing Cold War-era arguments that women are too emotional for positions of power, particularly regarding nuclear weapons. However, the current White House leadership exhibits notably emotional behavior, including inflammatory language from communications officials and the president's public displays of anger and personal grievances. This pattern suggests that emotional decision-making is not uniquely a female characteristic, challenging the premise underlying questions about female presidential fitness.
#female-leadership #emotional-decision-making #presidential-politics #gender-bias #white-house-communication
Read at The Conversation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]