Chinese Cosmopolitanism critiques Western perspectives, highlighting inherent racism within academic discourse regarding Chinese philosophy. David C. Kang praises the book for its in-depth research and its potential impact on the social sciences and humanities. Byung-Ho Lee notes the lack of comparative studies on Chinese cosmopolitan thought versus Western ideologies. The symposium underscores the importance of recognizing diverse philosophical contributions globally while anticipates resistance to such critiques. Xiang's work promises to challenge established narratives and foster broader academic engagement with diverse cultural perspectives.
Shuchen Xiang's Chinese Cosmopolitanism is a wonderful book. Deeply researched and deeply provocative, Xiang argues that there is inherent racism in the West's academic views of itself and of Chinese philosophy.
Xiang's critiques of the Western academy are sure to be met with resistance, if not hostility. However, her work is important for the social sciences and the humanities.
There is a need for more research focusing on what distinguishes the Chinese cosmopolitan mentalité from the worldview of other civilizations, particularly the Western ideal.
Xiang's book will be widely read and provide a path forward across various scholarly disciplines towards truly global and international scholarship.
Collection
[
|
...
]