"The Quinlan case established for the first time that decisions near the end of life should be made by patients and families, not by doctors and hospitals alone."
"After months of agonizing over their daughter's plight, the Quinlans decided she would not want her biological life prolonged indefinitely in this condition and that it was not in her best interests."
"When a persistent vegetative state is properly diagnosed, recovering cognitive ability is extremely rare."
"The family knew Karen as a very active, athletic and energetic young woman, who, when terminally ill people she knew had received aggressive treatments, had said she would not want similar measures."
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruling in the case of Karen Ann Quinlan marked a pivotal moment in American patients' rights. Quinlan, who suffered a cardiac arrest leading to a persistent vegetative state, prompted her family to advocate for her right to refuse life-sustaining treatment. The court's decision emphasized the importance of patient and family involvement in end-of-life decisions, shaping bioethics and legal standards regarding death with dignity. This case has had lasting implications for how such decisions are approached in healthcare settings.
Read at The Conversation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]