
"Architecture has always been more than bricks and mortar. It is equally constructed through words, ideas, and narratives. From ancient treatises to radical manifestos, from technical manuals to poetic essays, the written word has served as a spatial, pedagogical, and political tool within the field. Writing shapes how architecture is conceptualized, communicated, and critiqued - often long before, or even in the absence of, physical construction."
"Historically, figures such as Vitruvius, Alberti, and Palladio employed writing to codify principles, project ideals, and legitimize architecture as a discipline. In the modern era, Le Corbusier, Adolf Loos, and Lina Bo Bardi wrote prolifically to expand the scope of architecture beyond form and function, often using publications as tools for persuasion and experimentation. The postwar period gave rise to new editorial strategies, as evident in the manifestos of Archizoom and Superstudio,"
"Today, architectural writing is published across a range of platforms, engaging voices from editors, theorists, practitioners, and students. In this way, writing continues to operate as a core architectural practice, not as a supplement to building, but as a means of constructing the discipline itself. In an increasingly interdisciplinary field, where architecture is often practiced beyond the construction site, writing offers a space of projection, critique, and invention, a way of imagining, organizing, and ultimately shaping the built and unbuilt world."
Language, ideas, narratives, and publications have functioned alongside construction to conceptualize, communicate, and critique architecture. Historical figures consolidated principles and legitimized the discipline through treatises and manifestos, extending architectural practice beyond built form. Modern and postwar intellectuals leveraged publications and editorial strategies to persuade, experiment, and propose alternative projects. Contemporary practice publishes across diverse platforms, engaging editors, theorists, practitioners, and students, and positions discourse as a primary method of projection, critique, and invention. In interdisciplinary contexts where practice extends beyond construction sites, discourse operates as an active tool for imagining, organizing, and shaping both built and unbuilt environments.
Read at ArchDaily
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]