Is Your Idea Op-Ed Ready? Here's a Test to Find Out
Briefly

Is Your Idea Op-Ed Ready? Here's a Test to Find Out
"You have expert insights-plenty of them. You give impromptu lectures in office hours, debate podcast guests midrun and readily join boisterous debates over dinner. Maybe you're even drafting a book that builds a careful case from your expert point of view. But when it comes time to write your own op-ed? That sharp idea can start to feel too complex, too niche or-let's be honest-too wordy for 800 words aimed at a general audience."
"That's not a failing; it's a feature of your training. Academics are trained to distill ideas for their peers, not for nonspecialists. You argue carefully, if not compactly. You cite meticulously, not conversationally. But public writing demands something different-skills to illuminate complex concepts in a way that an intelligent lay reader can follow, feel and act on. Before you spend an afternoon translating your expert insight into an 800-word article you pitch to a newspaper or magazine, run your idea through this op-ed readiness test."
"Who cares? It's a tough question, but not a cynical one. Just because something fascinates you doesn't mean that it matters to the broader public. That's not a judgment of your topic. It's a reminder to find the resonance. What's at stake beyond your personal experience or corner of the discipline? You don't have to write about what's already dominating headlines."
Academics often craft careful, citation-rich arguments aimed at peers, which can feel too detailed or technical for general audiences. Public-facing pieces require clarity, concision, and conversational framing that connects complex ideas to everyday stakes. An effective readiness check asks who beyond the discipline will care, what is at stake, and how the idea changes understanding or behavior. Urgency can derive from insight rather than headline heat. Identifying specific audiences, clarifying relevance, and translating technical claims into tangible consequences increases the likelihood that expert ideas will persuade and prompt reflection or action.
[
|
]