Why international law is still the world's best defence
Briefly

Why international law is still the world's best defence
"Unless the peace that follows recognises that the whole world is one neighbourhood and does justice to the whole human race, the germs of another world war will remain as a constant threat to mankind. Today, that coveted peace is increasingly fragile."
"The post-war architecture conceived to avert great-power conflict, institutionalise interstate cooperation, reduce hot wars and entrench human rights within binding international law is now under acute pressures. It faces a combustible mix of resurgent ultranationalism, hyperintensified zero-sum strategic rivalries and hegemonic power plays."
"Multilateral institutions that once underwrote stability are increasingly marginalised or instrumentalised for geopolitical ends. Foundational treaties are hollowed out or breached outright, compliance regimes weakened and enforcement mechanisms rendered inert, leaving the post-war international system exposed to the very coercive power politics it was designed to contain."
The post-World War II international order, designed to prevent global catastrophe through multilateral cooperation and binding international law, faces unprecedented pressures. Resurgent ultranationalism, intensified strategic rivalries, and hegemonic power plays undermine foundational institutions and treaties. Multilateral organizations are marginalized or exploited for geopolitical advantage, while compliance mechanisms weaken and enforcement becomes ineffective. The UN Charter's core principle—prohibiting force except in self-defense or with Security Council authorization—faces direct threats. This deterioration enables a shift toward coercive power politics where military might displaces legal right, reversing decades of progress in institutionalizing interstate cooperation and human rights protections.
Read at www.aljazeera.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]